Showcase Sessions Enforcement of EU law and competition law by private parties Session Chair Jacques Buhart Herbert Smith, Paris/Brussels; IBA Nominations Committee EU law and competition law grant certain rights to private parties through directives and regulations as well as the European Union Treaty. Recently, many private parties seek damages for conduct in breach of competition law, such as cartels or abuse of dominant position, not only in the European Courts in Luxemburg, but also in national courts. The amount of damages awarded has substantially increased, but substantive and procedural difficulties remain. AlsoMember States and national authorities sometimes fail to implement or observe rules of EU law which private parties wish to enforce. Further, authorities and national courts may need guidance in the application of EU law and competition law when enforcing private rights. Private parties may also need to confirm or contest the validity of contractual provisions that may constitute illegal competition restrictions. This showcase discusses the channels available for private parties to enforce EU law and competition law, be it in relation to Member States, authorities or other private parties. • Is such enforcement effective in practice? • Are the rights and remedies of private parties sufficient? • Are the channels available suitable for enforcement purposes? • What common issues and problems arise in enforcement through such channels? • Where are we going with private enforcement of competition law in the EU and US? • What are the early-stage concerns in EU law enforcement in the new Member States? Speakers Emil Paulis Director, DG Competition, European Commission, Brussels, Belgium Christian Wik Roschier Holmberg, Helsinki, Finland Mark Brealey Brick Court Chambers, London, England Lloyd Constantine Constantine Cannon, New York, USA Tomasz Wardynski Wardynski & Partners, Warsaw, Poland Iñigo Igartua Gomez-Acebo Pombo, Barcelona, Spain; Vice-Chair, Antitrust 1030 – 1230 MONDAY Forum Hall, PCC
How far can laws reach? The problem of extraterritoriality
Session Co-Chairs Charles H Lawton Rio Tinto Plc, London, England; IBA Treasurer David W Rivkin Debevoise & Plimpton LLP, New York, USA; Vice-Chair, Legal Practice Division As globalisation continues to shrink the commercial world, governments and courts are increasingly seeking to extend their reach beyond national borders. The ever-widening scope of the activities caught in these jurisdictional battles is causing dismay within the international business community. From its origins in US antitrust law, many jurisdictions now impose the extraterritorial application of domestic law over a myriad of issues in the fields of banking, securities, transport, tax, telecommunications, trade sanctions and even human rights. Instances of states seeking to impose their domestic law on foreign trade are not hard to find. Apart from the well-known antitrust cases involving Boeing/McDonald Douglas, GE/Honeywell and Microsoft, the US Helms-Burton Act, which imposes criminal liability on foreign nationals trading with Cuba, and the EC Privity Directive, which controls the holding of personal data outside the EC, have also caused consternation among companies operating outside the issuing jurisdiction. Arguably, Sarbanes-Oxley, dealing with securities law, and the OECD Convention on Bribery and Corruption are other examples of significant extraterritorial exertion. The US Supreme Court has also recently upheld an 18th century Act of the first US Congress, the Alien Tort Statute, as permitting US courts to hear human rights cases involving non-US citizens outside the US, although it significantly limited the application of the Act from what had been permitted by lower courts. While governments have an interest in effectively applying their laws, this trend also poses a threat to international trade. It creates a climate of uncertainty. It may expose companies and individuals to prejudiced and unfair treatment in foreign courts and can even result in companies facing conflicting legal requirements. The overall effect is to discourage overseas foreign investment which, in turn, leads to lower growth and lower employment. The speakers on this showcase will focus on the conflicting interests of the governmental and business communities and contrast the different approaches adopted in a variety of jurisdictions. They will analyse the applicable international law and suggest ways to minimise the risk of jurisdictional conflict by, for example, the application of the widely recognised principles of comity and forum non conveniens, better inter-governmental cooperation and the adoption of international treaties and standards. Keynote Speakers The Right Honourable Lord Peter Goldsmith QC Attorney General for England and Wales, London, England Dieter Lange Chairman, ICC Task Force on Extraterritoriality; Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP, London, England Speakers Nicola Bonucci OECD, Paris, France Thomas J Brandt Managing Counsel, Shell Oil Company, Houston, Texas, USA Justice Richard Goldstone Former Justice of the Constitutional Court of
South Africa, Morningside, South Africa; Co-Chair, IBA Human Rights Institute Olivier Guersent Special Adviser to Competition Commissioner of the European Commission, Brussels, Belgium Simone Lahorgue Nunes General Counsel, Globo, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil Nicolai von Ruckteschell Senior Vice-President and General Counsel, Lufthansa, Frankfurt am Main, Germany Elpidio Villarreal Associate General Counsel-Litigation, Schering-Plough Corporation, Kenilworth, New
Jersey, USA Judge Diane P Wood United States Court of Appeals, Chicago, Illinois, USA
0930 – 1230 WEDNESDAY Forum Hall, PCC
The European Court of Human Rights – what business lawyers need to know
Presented by the Human Rights Institute and European Forum
Session Co-Chairs Ambassador Emilio Cárdenas Former Permanent Representative to the United Nations for Argentina, Buenos Aires, Argentina; Former IBA President; Co-Chair, IBA Human Rights Institute Judge Elisabet Fura-Sandström European Court of Human Rights, Strasbourg, France In the wake of the abolition of totalitarian systems in Europe, the abuse of power by governmental institutions now may take place in the area of commercial activities. This session is an attempt to contribute to the development of the scope of protection offered to European citizens by the European Convention on Human Rights. The session shall examine: • the structure, scope and role of the European Court of Human Rights; • the extent to which the European Convention on Human Rights can go beyond traditional areas of rights’ protection; • where it embraces corporate social responsibility issues and what role the European Court of Human Rights can play in the enforcement of corporate social responsibility schemes in the international business community; • whether Convention rights can be used to challenge governmental and regulatory decision-making; • what kind of protection is available under the Convention to employees and how can such protection evolve? • an American perspective: regulation of business companies and MNEs using human rights jurisprudence. Speakers Patrick Doris Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer, London, England Judge Elisabet Fura-Sandström Dr Birgit Spiesshofer Hengeler Mueller, Berlin, Germany Professor Andzrej Marion Swiatkowski Professor of Law, Jagiellonian University, Krakow, Poland James Rayis PC Sokolow Carreras Lemoine & Partners, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
0930 – 1230 THURSDAY Forum Hall - Parter, PCC
The lawyer’s role in society
Presented by Development of the Legal Profession and the Bar Issues Commission
Session Co-Chairs Malcolm Wallis SC Durban, South Africa; Vice-Chair, Bar Issues Commission; Council, Public and Professional Interest Division Lord Daniel Brennan QC Matrix Chambers, London, England; Co-Chair, Development of the Legal Profession Willem Calkoen NautaDutilh, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Co-Chair, Development of the Legal Profession This annual, highly interactive session allows experts, including Bar Leaders and leading individual legal practitioners, to address hot topics affecting the legal profession and the Bars. This year’s session will approach the lawyer’s role in society from the angle of the perception of core values in society. The session will focus on the legal profession’s core values as essential cornerstones of a just, free and democratic society. After years of discussion within the profession, this session will centre around a discussion, led by a journalist, in which representatives of the profession defend its core values to representatives of its clients and the media. Speakers Steve Lipin Former Editor, Wall Street Journal, London, England Stewart White Former Policy
Director, Vodafone, Berkshire, England
Seichi
Yoshikawa, Japan Federation of Bar Associations, Tokyo,
Japan
1400 – 1700 FRIDAY Panorama Hall, PCC
|